Sagot :
Answer:
Liberal
Explanation:
Liberal internationalism, a cluster of ideas derived from the belief that international progress is possible, where progress is defined as a movement toward increasing levels of harmonious cooperation between political communities.
Answer:
I think that liberal internationalism is characterized by the insistence on the right to private property — and hence on the existence (and nowadays with neoliberals the expansion) of a laissez-faire economic system, I.e., capitalism, usually accompanied by ‘open markets’ for goods such as food —- because US food, well subsidized by the US government, is cheap on foreign markets and can frequently undercut local food producers’ prices …… (If you are contrasting liberal with conservative internationalism, it has traditionally been the case that liberals are more concerned about human rights and democracy than conservatives, who prefer or emphasize order.)
Socialist internationalism — that is more difficult to characterize. If you mean the USSR, socialist internationalism was carrying out the USSR’s foreign policies. If you mean China, which strikes me as a dirigiste capitalist country, it means trying to bring other countries within China’s orbit and sometimes taking over or running parts of the other country’s economy. I think a truly socialist internationalism would … what? … either stay out of the other country’s internal affairs *or* insist that the fruits of internationalism go not only to the rich.
Explanation:
thank you hope it helpss