Answer:
Sampling saves money by allowing researchers to gather the same answers from a sample that they would receive from the population. Non-random sampling is significantly cheaper than random sampling, because it lowers the cost associated with finding people and collecting data from them.
Save Time
Contacting everyone in a population takes time. And, invariably, some people will not respond to the first effort at contacting them, meaning researchers have to invest more time for follow-up. Random sampling is much faster than surveying everyone in a population, and obtaining a non-random sample is almost always faster than random sampling. Thus, sampling saves researchers lots of time.
Save Money
The number of people a researcher contacts is directly related to the cost of a study. Sampling saves money by allowing researchers to gather the same answers from a sample that they would receive from the population.
Non-random sampling is significantly cheaper than random sampling, because it lowers the cost associated with finding people and collecting data from them. Because all research is conducted on a budget, saving money is important.
Explanation:
希望对你有帮助/ Hope it helps you
